Actually when I said "intervals" I was mistaken, it was the samples I 
increased. They render faster than intervals but even with this setting, 
which still has some artefacts, it takes about 10 times longer than the rest 
of the scene :-(

-- 
Tek
http://evilsuperbrain.com


news:456c9a86$1@news.povray.org...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Tek wrote:
>> tweaked!
>>
>> Improved rock & grass texture so the middle distance looks less flat and
>> boring, although perhaps now too dark. And way better clouds, though 
>> still
>> some striped artefacts (despite intervals=4).
>>
> You should lower the interval back to 1 and increase the samples
> instead. With the right settings, you should get something that
> looks better *and* renders faster...
>
> Jerome
> - --
> +------------------------- Jerome M. BERGER ---------------------+
> |    mailto:jeb### [at] freefr      | ICQ:    238062172            |
> |    http://jeberger.free.fr/     | Jabber: jeb### [at] jabberfr   |
> +---------------------------------+------------------------------+
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFFbJqgd0kWM4JG3k8RAs2gAJ9yl+sHgnqYw9JJ6qSMu4aSkddPcwCfe9LR
> E/l9ZPwWBu/WmiaYW39gc2c=
> =aeXg
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Post a reply to this message