"Alain" <ele### [at] netscapenet> schreef in bericht 
news:454089a3$1@news.povray.org...
>
> When you have very detailled trees, you only use 1 or 2, maybe 3. For the 
> background trees, it's usualy beter to use mesh trees.
> Not all isosurfaces are very slow. It depend on it's complexity and 
> gradiant.
>
Thanks Alain!
Yes, I agree about the background trees. It wouldn't make really sense to 
use isosurfaces for that, so my question there was a little unrealistic. 
Still, I am curious about render time of Kenneth's isosurface tree in 
conjunction with (as you mentioned) its complexity, and the levels of detail 
(bark in particular).

Thomas

Post a reply to this message