"Mike Williams" <nos### [at] econymdemoncouk> schreef in bericht 
news:YiwFXRANd1MFFw+j### [at] econymdemoncouk...
>
> The problem is that that syntax is already in use to mean something
> different.
>
> What it means is, apply YellowTransparantColor to any components in the
> group that don't already have their own texture{}. In this case, all the
> components do have their own texture, so nothing happens.
>
> You wouldn't want to change that old syntax, because it would break
> large numbers of existing scenes. You wouldn't want the syntax to have
> the old meaning if there are any untextured components and have the new
> meaning if there are none, because that would get very confusing
> particularly if you intended to texture all the components but missed a
> tiny part of a very complex CSG.
>
> -- 
Thank you Mike, for your explanation. I was sure there was a catch :-)
What I meant by *elegant*  was in the same line as when you talk about 
clothes: they may be *elegant* but not necessarily confortable to wear! So, 
only for the eyes fixed on the catwalk.

Thomas

Post a reply to this message