Andycadd wrote:
> Is there an option to not keep a full copy in memory (freeing up that 320MB
> mentioned above) with or without a running display ?  I know this would be a
> speed hit but Rambus memory ain't cheap.  Or maybe just keep the previous
> row in memory and flush the extra?

Ben Chambers wrote:
> If it's really a problem with memory addressing, as you seem to be
> suggesting, perhaps a more suitable error message could be introduced?

As I said before: "disk buffering has not been implemented yet."  So this
issue will go away really "soon"...

	Thorsten

Post a reply to this message