Warp wrote:
> Andycadd <And### [at] comcastnet> wrote:
>> not so Strange that it works just fine with 3.6 but not 3.7 as 3.7 probably
>> uses a little more memory overhead
> 
>   No, there's nothing in 3.7 which should use more memory than 3.6. It is
> not normal. If you can come up with a good example scene, it would be very
> helpful.

You are mistaken, it is normal. The image output was changed, which does
matter if you have a 8K x 2K pixel image - that image will consume 320M
bytes of memory right now, as disk buffering has not been implemented yet.

	Thorsten

Post a reply to this message