"Trevor G Quayle" <Tin### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message 
news:web.450e8f0ec43a9bccc150d4c10@news.povray.org...
> "Data Banks" <da_### [at] ihugcomau> wrote:
>> Fixed it :)
>>
>> #declare accel= pow(2*clock,4)*20.5;
>> #declare lift=  pow(2.0*clock,(1/5));
>> #declare Powerup =  pow(5.0*clock,(1/10))/100;
>>
>> Yes yes, I know, my code is messy
>
> Yes, you've got it now.  This was changed quite awhile ago for reasons 
> that
> esacape me at the moment.
> -tgq
>
I thought I'd post the question, but while I waited I decided I'd re-read 
the manual (catch up on some of the changes since I started learning with 
3.1) and found it. I'll get used to it but I did like the ^ version 
personally

Post a reply to this message