"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> schreef in bericht news:450ae56f$1@news.povray.org...
>
>     But, you've got to do something about that texture (on the lower 
> pillars), because it looked SO good in your other image! Perhaps some kind 
> of procedural crackle might do it? (Not sure).
>
Steve, I am not sure I get your meaning. The texture is not looking so much 
different from the non-radiosity image I believe. There is already a (agate) 
turbulence/normal controlling the layered, averaged texture (visible on the 
closest pillar to the left). Towards the middle distance this becomes 
necessarily less visible. The same would hold for a crackle (for instance), 
so you would not really see it. And then, radiosity is also playing its part 
here.

Thomas

Post a reply to this message