|
 |
EagleSun nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 14/07/2006 16:26:
> "Trevor G Quayle" <Tin### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
>> Lately I've been participating in the lighting challenges hosted by Jeremy
>> Birn over at CGTalk (http://forums.cgsociety.org/forumdisplay.php?f=185).
>> (I have a feeling that I may be the only POVer there at the moment,
>> everyone elseseems to be using commercial level progs)
>> Anyways, here is one of my latest entries in the latest challenge that I
>> wanted to share here.
>>
>> -tgq
>>
>> p.s. It would be nice to maybe see some more POV presence if anyone is
>> looking for a challenge.
>
> WOW!@
>
> I think you are going to win this one.... Lots of professional-looking
> software use many rendering shortcuts and take away from real physics light
> modelling. It's too expensive (on CPU) to render things right. But if you
> want to win the prize, you need to pay the price.
>
> You are using internal media, right? I suggest to bump up the "interval"
> and "sample". Those 2 parameters are extremely expensive, but they produce
> lively results.
>
>
Using method 3, DON'T increase intervals but bump up samples. Increasing intervals
greatly increase
render time. Increasing samples only have a moderate incidence on render time, and
usualy give you
beter results.
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
There will always be beer cans rolling on the floor of your car when the boss asks
for a ride home from the office.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
