"Carl" <car### [at] semisouthcom> wrote in message 
news:web.44b263b7e4538ab670dc520d0@news.povray.org...
> "Zeger Knaepen" <zeg### [at] povplacecom> wrote:
>> I might be mistaken, but don't you loose the adaptive advantage of +am2
>> if you have +a0.0 ?
>
> Yes you do but if you have a very thin line going through a pixel it could
> easily be missed all together if its set to anything else.

oh, yes, ic, with +r4 or higher you do get an advantage by using +am2

... or am I totally misinterpreting the adaptive aa-method? :)

cu!
-- 
#macro G(b,e)b+(e-b)*C/50#end#macro _(b,e,k,l)#local C=0;#while(C<50)
sphere{G(b,e)+3*z.1pigment{rgb G(k,l)}finish{ambient 1}}#local C=C+1;
#end#end _(y-x,y,x,x+y)_(y,-x-y,x+y,y)_(-x-y,-y,y,y+z)_(-y,y,y+z,x+y)
_(0x+y.5+y/2x)_(0x-y.5+y/2x)            // ZK http://www.povplace.com

Post a reply to this message