"Mike Raiford" <mra### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message 
news:4496b7c2$1@news.povray.org...
> St. wrote:
>> http://www.irtc.org/stills/2006-04-30.html
>>
>>    Thank you irtc admin. It was a long wait this time, but appreciated.
>>
>>     ~Steve~
>
> Just my opinion, here... but, While the winner for technical merit is an 
> excellent image, There's really not that much "technical merit" to the 
> picture. All was modeled in Wings3D,

    As was mine, and I placed 7th, and I am *well chuffed* with that!  :)

     Is there a problem with using a modelling prog for the IRTC  instead of 
CSG in PoV-Ray, Mike?  After all, the IRTC is not PoV-Ray related. I thought 
that this was a -general- raytracing comp. where any modelling prog and 
raytracer would be exceptable regardless of the raytracing program used?


with exception of the feather,
> which was using a 3rd party tool. Not bad, but, not what I would call 
> deserving of a technical merit award. Meh, these are judged by 
> participants and a panel, so, that is what it is... hmm.
>
> Perhaps this was swapped accidentally with one of the place awards?


      Well, all top six look correct to me...  <shrug>

       ~Steve~


>
> -- 
> ~Mike
>
> Things! Billions of them!

Post a reply to this message