kinnison <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> Surely if no new work has been done on the beta work, at least we could have
> a new executable with an extended date, say 31st May? How hard would that be
> to do??

  But the problem is precisely that work *has* been done, and it may just
not be possible to build a working binary (ie. compiles, runs and is
bug-free as far as the developer can tell) right now, before all the
work-in-progress code is ready.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message