"Bob Hughes" <omniverse@charter%net> schreef in bericht
news:43fae38b$1@news.povray.org...
> Thanks for giving the partial script earlier, Thomas. I just now got a
look
> at a rendering of that here and saw the container bubble this time. I was
> going to ask if you had POV 3.6.1a or the 3.6.1b but I guess that's not
the
> reason anyhow.
>
> I didn't know you were using two fogs together before this point in time,
> thinking it was only media and one fog. I have no idea why the two fogs
> cause the media container to appear.
>

Thank you Bob, for taking time to look into this. Which shows again, by the
way, that it is always important to give complete information. Small details
(like one or two fogs) can easily be overlooked when just asking questions.

In fact, in the latter case, it is not the fog which causes the container to
appear! The container is carved out of the isosurface whether there is a fog
or not! I am puzzled because I cannot find any document treating this
matter. But I may be overlooking the obvious (I wouldn't be surprised).

So I end up with two problems.
1. interaction media and 2 fogs
2. interaction media and isosurface

Thomas

Post a reply to this message