m1j wrote:

> This was not to be a comparison but that is what it became.
> 
> 

Good line.  Yes it is a very open ended sort of exercise but of interest 
none-the-less.  It is not about the final conclusion but about what you 
discover along the way.  Logically, it seems to me that to get a "match" 
you will ultimately have to dumb down the comparitively superior 
abilities of each program.  OTOH, to make a comparison of quality you 
would end up with a circular sort of conclusion. But handled correctly 
the exercise could offer some interesting insights.

Post a reply to this message