-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thomas de Groot wrote:
> "stm31415" <sam### [at] cscom> schreef in bericht
>>My main problem with the waterfall is not hte way it looks (though it
> would
> 
>>be nicer if you worked on that) but is it's geological effect on the
>>surroundings. It seems to have had no effect whatsoever on the cliff.
>>Either put a dent in the cliff (hard?) or move and scale the waterfall so
>>as to place it in an extant dent.
>>
> Well, it *is* in a lower part of the cliff, but I agree that it looks
> somewhat artificial there. Oh well, there is still a lot to do on it!
> 

	As a reference for a similar waterfall, you might find these
interesting:
http://www.henrik-ks.dk/photoshtml/BrecheDeRoland/06_23TinaAndHenrikInfronfOfTheGavarnieLaGrandeCascade.JPG
http://www.stmarys-sfc.ac.uk/lourdes2004/On%20the%20way%20to%20the%20glacier%20at%20Gavarnie.JPG
http://www.balades-pyrenees.com/gavarnie_gravure.htm

		Jerome

- --
******************************
*      Jerome M. Berger      *
*  mailto:jeb### [at] freefr   *
*  http://jeberger.free.fr/  *
******************************
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFD5HIod0kWM4JG3k8RAjoFAKCaK4TCurp50IO7lgrcDRyuOI0MqQCeLHuz
6Q9BWPaf7HHGUCMoIGWjI8Y=
=ZGmC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Post a reply to this message