Bill Pragnell wrote:
> Here's a little more wanton destruction for you all. I must profess to be a
> little concerned at the eagerness for more of these pictures fro some of
> you! ;)
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 

As I was looking at the image, something looked weird to me.
It looks as if the tower is 'bowed' towards the impact site.

 From your description of the routine, this is to be expected.
To get closer to real life, you may want to allow the user to define the 
falloff distance factor (how distance from impact effects disturbance).
You may even consider allowing a limiting factor - at this ditance, 
there is no effect.

Just some thoughts.

Tom

Post a reply to this message