Io and europa has more potential. The trouble with Io and a comet is they're 
2 completely independant bodies in space, that you've brought together for 
the topic. i.e. you've got one picture of fire, and one picture of ice, but 
nothing relating the 2. The main focus of both my images is some kind of 
interaction between the two extremes, particularly in the comet scene where 
the ice would actually cause fire when it burns up in the atmosphere.

But Io and Europa are interesting because they're 2 extremes orbitting the 
same planet. Still, I'm not going to try that one I've got too many ideas 
already!

-- 
Tek
http://evilsuperbrain.com

"andrel" <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message 
news:43D### [at] hotmailcom...
> Tek wrote:
>> Ah, but there's 2 problems with that: There's not enough atmosphere 
>> around Io for the icy comet to catch fire, and there's no ice on the 
>> surface of Io (as far as I know). So really it loses the point of both 
>> images! Besides I'm not looking for a compromise,
> I know, but I was ;) (bad habit, I know)
>
>> I think each image has enough in it already and trying to combine them 
>> will make it crowded and confusing (to be honest, I think the comet image 
>> already runs the risk of confusing people).
>>
>> Thanks for the suggestion anyway, and feel free to correct me if I 
>> misinterpretted your suggestion :)
>>
> The suggestion was more or less that including Io in a space image
> automatically included the fire, because of its vulcanos, and as
> you had already started modelling them for the other image...
>
> I also like the idea of Io and Europa, but that would leave no room
> for your nice icy comet particles, so we leave that for someone else,
> I guess.
>
>

Post a reply to this message