|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmail com> schreef in bericht
news:web.43d4a6287e4cb3a3731f01d10@news.povray.org...
> I think it's brilliant. The landscape truly looks the scale it should be,
at
> least for this image size. It may look more model-like at larger
> resolutions. If you can preserve this intricacy in a bigger image it'll be
> amazing.
>
> I'm happy with a double star - they are, after all, at least as common as
> lone stars!
>
> I think it might benefit from a more pronounced horizon gradient though -
> either a second layer of (very thin) fog to a greater altitude, or a
> gradient pattern on the sky object.
>
> Keep it up!
>
Thanks, Bill! This is indeed the first stage where I begin to feel it is a
'mature' scene. It is slow work but within acceptable margins. When
necessary, I use the isosurface approximation macro to get rough bearings.
Yes, I wonder about the larger resolution too. Everything depends, I
believe, on the foreground. If that is too schematic or primitive, the scene
will not pass the test. So, more work there is needed anyway.
Horizon gradient: yes indeed. My idea is/was to have a thin cloud layer
somewhere halfway up the cliff in the background. I tried with Gilles Tran's
makecloud macro, but was not successful yet (cloud would not appear). I have
to experiment more, or try other things, or go for a second thin fog
probably. Stay tuned!
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |