POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : assumed_gamma 1.0/2.0 per discussion : Re: assumed_gamma 1.0/2.0 per discussion Server Time
7 Aug 2024 19:23:30 EDT (-0400)
  Re: assumed_gamma 1.0/2.0 per discussion  
From: Thomas de Groot
Date: 29 Dec 2005 03:22:47
Message: <43b39cd7@news.povray.org>
"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] earthlinknet> schreef in bericht
news:web.43b38ea7db5693254a6a0d0@news.povray.org...
> These images relate to a gamma discussion over at
>
http://news.povray.org/povray.general/thread/%3Cweb.439a1b692d1f46002a1c213f
0%40news.povray.org%3E/
>
>
> Which image looks more realistic?
>

Without any understanding of the physical properties behind the whole
discussion (and I want to keep it so!), I would definitely say 1.0

For me, 2.0 is too dark; the terminator line is at the wrong place (Too far
to the right) for a very distant light source.

Thomas


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.