|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Alain wrote:
> Anthony D. Baye nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2005-10-12 20:50:
>
>> Mike Williams wrote:
>>
>>> Apart from the absence of the plasma tube, I'd say it was Thistledown.
>>>
>>> Where does your hollow asteroid get its light from?
>>>
>> Wow. Someone else reads what I read.
>>
>> A.D.B.
>>
>> P.S. Alain, Gravity is based on mass. A sphere the size of earth's
>> orbit with a shell thick enough to withstand impacts would naturally
>> have a reasonable amount of gravity on it's inside surface.
>
>
> The gravitational pull from the relatively small but very near region
> under your feet is exactly countered by that of the extremely large and
> distant part over your head.
> That leave you with ONLY the gravity from the sun witch is straight
> up... NOT a good thing.
>
Far be it from me to dislike being proved wrong.
but an interesting factoid: Larry Niven's Ringworld, which was
conceived as an intermediate step toward a dyson sphere, spun at 770
mi/h. It was determined that, in order to withstand the shearing forces
from the spin, the base material which measured 1000' thick would have
had to have had a tensile strength on the order of the force which holds
the nucleus of an atom together.
A.D.B.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |