St. wrote:
> Does an image *need* a 'meaningful' title so that the viewer understands
> more readily what is going on?
>
> I understand that some images may be obvious, but what if they're not
> to the viewer?
>
> I'm having problems at the moment with what to name some of my
> <hopefully!> minimalism images, (about five of them).
>
> ~Steve~
>
After looking up a lot of the minimalist artists and their works I'm
beginning to think minimalism means not having anything going on. Very
basic nothings seems to be the key.
Maybe a series... nothing #1, nothing #2 etc...
RG
Post a reply to this message
|