Urs Holzer wrote:
> I don't know anything about the definition of minimalism but while
> reading your statements, the following comes to my mind:
> One could use minimalist objects such as spheres, boxes or pixels to
> create something complex like text.

This is true, but that would be almost the opposite of minimalism. One 
could say minimalism is the art of expressing something using the bare 
minimum of elements in the image. For example whilst you could make a 
tree using thousands of boxes, can you see a way to create a 
recognisable tree with just 3 boxes?

Though, of course, that example lacks the abstract aspect of minimalism, 
but that's well beyond my abilities to explain. e.g. Does the red circle 
make you feel happy? ;)

Tek

Post a reply to this message