St. wrote:
> Or rather, as I haven't done anything like minimalism, (at least I don't 
> think so with my images), would this be a minimalist image?
> 
>   ~Steve~
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 

Late to the party. I searched this out after seeing your reference to it 
in i.stills.

I vote no. This is not Minimalist. How can an image be Minimalist when 
the  "Maximalist" version of the idea would be so nearly identical? 
Rusty round things on beams in a room. It's all here. Sure, you could 
add a few light bulbs, birds, whatever. It would still be "rusty round 
things on beams in a room". The "underneath" is not shown.

FWIW, it is a nice looking image.

  -Shay

Post a reply to this message