|
|
Lonnie spake:
> Stefan Viljoen <sviljoen@<removethis>polard.com> wrote:
>> This image took about one year to render, first with a 1.8 system running
>> 24/7 for about eight months, then a 3 gHz machine running for the
>> remaining four, 24/7.
>>
>> Sorta an experiment (as regards isosurfaces, media, and media quality
>> settings) that failed. I thought it would look nicer.
>>
>> Clearly, longer (or VERY long) trace times don't neccessarily lead to
>> better images...
>>
>> Just thought I'd share the disappointment!
>> --
>> Stefan Viljoen
>> Software Support Technician / Programmer
>> Polar Design Solutions
>
> Take heart Stefan - the road to media mastery is paved with patience, and
> I
> am amazed at how patient you are. I am currently 25% into the rendering
> of
> a crystal object using photons, media, and radiosity. With luck it will
> be finished four more days, but I am already itching to abort and start
> tweaking. I guess it's time for a multi-processor system (or several of
> them!)
Thanks - well, if I can scrape together the cash for another HT P4, I should
be alright. Then I can throw 4 processor at a trace, not just 2 as I have a
the moment... oh yeah!
I think I maybe have a bit too much patience thought - 4 days for a
media/photons/radiosity trace doesn't sound too bad.
--
Stefan Viljoen
Software Support Technician / Programmer
Polar Design Solutions
Post a reply to this message
|
|