POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : The image that took a year to render...sucks (70kb) : Re: The image that took a year to render...sucks (70kb) Server Time
8 Aug 2024 22:11:09 EDT (-0400)
  Re: The image that took a year to render...sucks (70kb)  
From: Stefan Viljoen
Date: 6 Jun 2005 01:40:36
Message: <42a3e1d3@news.povray.org>
Lonnie spake:

> Stefan Viljoen <sviljoen@<removethis>polard.com> wrote:
>> This image took about one year to render, first with a 1.8 system running
>> 24/7 for about eight months, then a 3 gHz machine running for the
>> remaining four, 24/7.
>>
>> Sorta an experiment (as regards isosurfaces, media, and media quality
>> settings) that failed. I thought it would look nicer.
>>
>> Clearly, longer (or VERY long) trace times don't neccessarily lead to
>> better images...
>>
>> Just thought I'd share the disappointment!
>> --
>> Stefan Viljoen
>> Software Support Technician / Programmer
>> Polar Design Solutions
> 
> Take heart Stefan - the road to media mastery is paved with patience, and
> I
> am amazed at how patient you are.  I am currently 25% into the rendering
> of
> a crystal object using photons, media, and radiosity.  With luck it will
> be finished four more days, but I am already itching to abort and start
> tweaking. I guess it's time for a multi-processor system (or several of
> them!)

Thanks - well, if I can scrape together the cash for another HT P4, I should
be alright. Then I can throw 4 processor at a trace, not just 2 as I have a
the moment... oh yeah!

I think I maybe have a bit too much patience thought - 4 days for a
media/photons/radiosity trace doesn't sound too bad.

-- 
Stefan Viljoen
Software Support Technician / Programmer
Polar Design Solutions


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.