High!

Gilles Tran wrote:

> If precision errors can be ruled out, then it looks like that the common 
> vertices of two adjacent triangles are actually slightly different... I've 
> never seen something like this in a regular mesh2. One possible way to test 
> this would be to choose one vertex coordinate (for instance x=3.8989901) and 
> search for the beginning of the string (without the last digits, for 
> instance 3.898). If you find something like x=3.898123 then it's probable 
> that the vertices are duplicated and slightly off.

I have no clue how to do this... I even didn't understand until now how 
face_indices work - it's all Greek to me! And posting the code would be 
useless without also posting the ASCII matrix - but the latter is about 
6 megs large!

In the original matrix, the elevation values are in fact integer 
numbers, but converted to floats, with an accuracy of 2 digits right of 
the point, such as 2894.00,2876.00,2803.00,... etc.

Perhaps I should erase all those useless .00s to get real integers...

See you in Khyberspace!

Yadgar

Now playing: Endless Dream (Yes)

Post a reply to this message