|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Jim Henderson wrote:
> When subscribing to a group with a title of 'binaries.animations', it's
> pretty obvious the files are going to be of a significant size. When
> subscribing to an 'images' group, it's not clear what the average size is.
> I would think that you'd *want* people to be interested in your images,
> not pissed off because it took longer than expected to download them over
> their 26.4Kbps dialup. I know if I was stuck with a slow dialup (which
> would've been less than 5 years ago), I'd be *very* unhappy with the waste
> of my limited bandwidth.
Cry me a frickin' river. The internet's not a right, it's a privilege
afforded with money. If you can't or won't pay up for a decent
connection, tough.. you get left behind. That's how computing always works.
I'm convinced your argument for consideration really boils down to this:
"I think I'm the only right one, so it's my way or the highway." And you
know what? That's not your decision to make.
-Xplo
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |