-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Eric CHAPUZOT wrote:
| and waste the time to find the good ratio of jpeg is nothing...
	90% quality will almost always give good results (it does for your
image) and it reduces the size to 110k. That's not optimal but it
still a whole lot better than 700k

| when i make a 700 ko picture on my computer and i must do a 200 ko
one, i
| loose 200 ko more on my disk space
	So, basically, you're saying that it's better to waste 500k
permanently on someone else's computer that to use 200k temporarily on
yours?

		Jerome

PS: No, Zeger isn't the only one to think that images should be posted
in JPEG...

- --
******************************
*      Jerome M. Berger      *
* mailto:jbe### [at] ifrancecom *
*  http://jeberger.free.fr/  *
******************************
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCY/diqIYJdJhyixIRArBYAJoDbBSIHZTUAEi03d7W4LBrhjVI+wCeI9US
rOKjUbw4uKD5TR4KV+Gg7pw=
=fwZa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Post a reply to this message