|
|
"Ross" <rli### [at] everestkcnet> wrote in message
news:421e54f5$1@news.povray.org...
<snip>
> While i think you have a right to be upset at the judges bias towards
> non-mesh models, i think it's a bit overly dramatic. Still, I was sort of
> surprised by their bluntness in this area.
>
> I was going to say, "Look at 'Victoria's World'. It uses non-pov things
> pretty extensively and got 3rd place", then i noticed this comment
> basically
> saying, "It would never win because it used so many things not directly
> made
> in POV." So i guess, the more I talk, the more i'm siding with you.
>
> [quote]
> The detail level is extremely high and there is good use made of POV-Ray's
> features, but the predominant use of external models (e.g. Victoria, the
> Dosch houses, Chris Colefax's Lens Effects include, Gilles Tran's
> MakeGrass)
> prevented it from making it further in my mind.
> [quote]
>
Yeah, I noticed that too. That made me uncomfortable mostly because I felt
like it was saying, "Had you re-invented the wheel, you would have gone
farther." I understand the point being made, but I felt that it was worded
poorly.
Also, despite the judge's comments, "Victoria's World" did get a
well-deserved 3rd place.
From one of Gilles' posts:
"Most judges won't be familiar with POV-Ray but the judges who know it will
able to add some balance to the discussions so that POV-Ray specific
features can be properly judged. However, the goal is still to make great
pictures, which means that quality remains central. As a judge, I would not
give extra points to a bad model because it's done in SDL. I would only
reward good models, whatever the tool used."
I really don't think that there was a lot of "SDL" bias, though. Jaime's
picture used several Wings models. Much of Chris Holtorff's scene was done
in Rhino. I could list many others. But making a 3rd party model the main
focus of an image is not as impressive as what Rene Bui did with Wings. Had
that been a Poser model, the image would certainly have scored lower.
Nevertheless, had it been a badly made model (which it wasn't!), it would
have placed lower.
--
Jeremy
www.beantoad.com
|
|