Renderdog wrote:
> I've generated different versions of the image, included here.
> "3" is the normal 3-point perspective. The problem here is the
> buildings appear to be leaning in, as they become smaller in the
> vertical distance.

   Yes, seems a bit inappropriate for that beautiful scene.

> "2" is the most commonly used perspective for buildings, it
> looks much more natural, though the buildings can look top-heavy.

   That looks very nice and natural.

> In "1", objects become smaller in only one axis, the axis into
> the screen. This produces a static image (fewer diagonals) and
> makes objects facing us appear perfectly square (unless they
> have depth, then they are distorted).

   This one is really strange... I prefer "2".

   Indeed, I'm really waiting to see this image finished... it's really 
promising, and you are almost there.

--
Jaime

Post a reply to this message