|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Jim Charter wrote:
>>
>>> The spatial achievements in your post exactly previous to this looked
>>> mindbending to me compared to this.
>>
>> Thank you, and it's posts like that one which compelled me to post
>> *this* image
>
> Whoosh, right over my head.
I meant posts like my own post previous to this one. Everything I post
here has been received *very* positively, but I wonder sometimes if I'm
not painting myself as some purist curmudgeon substituting philosophy
for chops. This one I think shows that I can have a little fun as well,
and it's definitely "chopped".
> I hadn't, but I get it. It is pretty common, especially among
> artists who anticipate the less trodden path, to do something
> early on to eastablish their bone fides with the,... more prosaic
> minded, shall we say?
Yeah, but the itch isn't *quite* scratched. I made this according to the
Povcomp rules, so it's all one pass. I want to make something where I
can cheat a little bit. Render in sections and paste the whole thing
back together. Too big, as well. Looks good HUGE, but I want to make
something that looks perfect at 1024x768. Every inch filled with details.
> What is interesting to me about the picture is the line it walks
> between the worst of kitsch, exotic, travel photography ( which I
> am addicted to by the way )
An almost perfect description of that look. I'm sure you've seen it many
times in NYC. I would add 'reverent' somewhere in the description, this
all having religious significance.
> Telling indeed. A homeless picture.
Not forever. This will go into the pho shop. I might render it at work
on the next three day weekend. Then there's affording the print and
frame. It's on the list. You know how it goes.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |