Thorsten Froehlich wrote:
> Apart from reading the "Usage" section, I recommend the examples section
> points "intentionally posting an outrageous argument deliberately
> constructed around a fundamental but obfuscated flaw or error [...]" and
> "after a flamewar ensues, pretending to be innocent".

If Paris 'obviously knows nothing about POV', how could he have 
*deliberately* constructed an argument based around a flaw or error?

-- 
Tim Cook
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Post a reply to this message