Thorsten Froehlich wrote:
> No, the problem was that the original poster was a troll.  The messages that
> clearly identified him as such have been removed now, so you likely missed
> them...

I believe I read the original posts.  They *were* a bit immature and 
unnecessarily caustic.  They may have been a troll, but they also may 
have been simply a misguided and very awkward attempt at expressing the 
questions of the poster without intending to incite an argument.  You 
quoted an article in which Paris apologizes for any misunderstandings, 
and then proceed to bash him, saying that he is, in effect, a moron. 
Who's the troll then?  Like I said before, tone it down a notch.

-- 
Tim Cook
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Post a reply to this message