|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Alain" <aze### [at] qwerty gov> wrote in message
news:41cb40a0$1@news.povray.org...
> Tim Nikias nous apporta ses lumieres ainsi en ce 2004-12-23 14:05... :
>
>>Hi all!
>>
>>The latest version of the image. I'm unsure if I really want to go ahead
>>and
>>add some clouds, mainly because the landscape already has much white and
>>extra clouds would subtract the nice blue-white-contrast.
>>
>>I'm thinking about pulling the distant lone tree with the fence a little
>>closer, there's still quite a gap between the forest and the fence. I'll
>>also need to add some more fine-detail to the main heightfield to avoid
>>the
>>plain white areas, that just look's awful.
>>
>>Tried putting some mountains at the horizon, but that just looked
>>ridiculously overloaded.
>>
>>Suggestions and comments welcome, as always! :-)
>>
>>Regards,
>>Tim
>>
>>
> If you want some clouds, I think they should be wispy, almost transparent.
> Contrary to Slime, I see no problem with the proximity of the fence and
> the forest, I've seen similar placement a few times. Maybe the owner of
> the fenced terrain used the trees from the gap to build the fence, or to
> heat his home...
> Some natural forests have virtualy no undergrowth or bushes under the
> trees, while having bushes near the edges. Just have the bushes closer to
> the trees would be OK.
>
> Alain
I like it.
Bushes and trees.
Its about competition for light. So you see a gradient from short to tall -
very rarely a step. And not so regular.
Best.
DLM
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |