|
|
"Dave Matthews" wrote:
> Alf Peake wrote:
>> Looks like a version of MCEscher's Cubic Space Division after too
> Alf, that's the best computer-generateed version of it I've seen.
Thanks
> You got the angle and the dimensions correct,
Considering that MCE used pen and paper, his accuracy was remarkable
but I found it difficult to duplicate exactly. I assumed he was unable
to avoid errors.
> Escher was clearly emphasizing, as usual, the duality of
I don't understand all his work but I like the symetry here, and the
illusions and visual puns in others.
Alf
Post a reply to this message
|
|