Noe Falzon wrote:
> I definitly love the bloody one !
> One thing, though : couldn't you fing a map with a better resolution (or 
> maybe it is just the jpg compression) ? I think it spoils a bit the 
> whole image. But the idea is great great great ! 

I see what you're saying, and I think it's a combination of both effects 
that are affecting the image.

Regarding the resolution of the map, this flyover animation has a much 
higher-res map:
   http://maps.forensiclogic.com/sac_flyover.wmv
but the .wmv compression artifacts were even worse than the .jpg 
artifacts in the still pictures I posted.    In larger .png images the 
cubes look much sharper and easy to recognise as well - but at least for 
a first pass I wanted to spare people the bandwidth.  Hopefully I'll 
incorporate people's suggestions and post a less compressed version of 
whatever the best approach might be.

Post a reply to this message