Unless the buildings have extensive "basements" of passageways and such that
go into and throughout the asteroid. In that case, the most convenient
arrangement (or at least the one least likely to drive people crazy) would
be to have all parts of the structure on roughly the same axes.
"Scott David Daniels" <Sco### [at] Acm Org> wrote in message
news:414b676f$1@news.povray.org...
> pov### [at] almostbestwebnet wrote:
> > The recent asteroid city pictures posted here made me
> > think of a different concept for an asteroid city.
> > Buildings have not been detailed yet. The asteroid is
> > an isosurface. The planet still need wowrk: I might
> > even take the planet out.
>
> Here's a suggestion: Don't share axes for the different buildings --
> they would have been placed where convenient (hence cadiwumpus to
> each other).
Post a reply to this message
|
