"Eli" <eli### [at] jehoelnet> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:4128b0aa$1@news.povray.org...
> The Cornell box is a good test scene.
I will first finish the renderings based on my current indoor-scene
because i've already rendered a few images and hours.

> I think a sample set should work at low sample counts.
What do you mean? I don't understand.
If you refer to my last sentence in the last post, i wanted
to say that especially at low sample-numbers it is hard to
detect a pattern in the golden-ratio approach so i think it's
quite good at low sample-values

> Maybe jittering the set in order to get rid of the visible patterns should
> help.
That's a good idea which i'm already trying at the moment. Perhaps this
is the most flexible solution. Combining the good distribution of the
goldenratio-method with the natural artifact-avoiding look of random
placement of samples.

Greetings,
Thies

Post a reply to this message