Hughes, B. wrote:
> Is the dome supposed to be missing every 4th beam? That was throwing my
> perception off at first while I looked at the symmetry of this structure.
> :)

Not really 'missing every 4th beam' but more like a cross made out of 
three beams only. It looks cool, I guess. The original didn't have it...

> Not only that, I can't help but notice the rotation offsets of the column
> base and cap blocks. Was the original like that, or are you changing those
> too? Or am I exposing your mistakes. Ha ha!

Not sure how the original did it, but I like it this way. We'll see.

> Bob H.
>

Post a reply to this message