Gail Shaw wrote:
> Fixed the rings and the lighting.
> 
> Done I think.
> 
> Gail
> --
> *************************************************************************
> * gsh### [at] sentechsacom        *  If one is going to lose one's mind,     *
> * http://gail.rucus.net/     *  one might as well savor the experience  *
> *************************************************************************
> * This is how the world ends. Swallowed in fire, but not in darkness    *
> *************************************************************************
> 
> 
> 
You know I was ready to go to war on behalf of your freedom to adjust 
the lighting however you want for effect, and not be constrained by the 
physical model.  But I must say I like this result much better.  Whether 
or not the correpondence between light sources and direction of shading 
is more consistent, I just like it that the rock particles are a little 
less "given" to the eye.  Some are volumetric, some silhoutted in 
shadow, some just specks of highlight.  It makes it a much more 
interesting picture.

Post a reply to this message