espri128 wrote:

> Hi Christoph,
> 
> sorry for my improper expressions, but i was very confused last night. And
> thanks for your help.
> Was there any hint for changing the sampling method for AA from 3.5 to 3.6
> I've not seen ? Or is the difference in the pics an effect from the new
> 'unclipped radiosity values' ?

IIRC, AA was changed to perfrom the operation before clipping instead of 
after clipping.

... I assume the posts you made had an assumed gamma setting in the 
global settings? This appears to be the source of the artifacts you are 
experiencing (assumed_gamma + high-quality antialiasing).

-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message