> The "correct C++ way" would be to use static_cast<int>().>> This is because reinterpret_cast<>() will not change the binary> representation...
Yeah, that's why I said "Not sure what type of cast it would be."
My point was, isn't "something_cast<int>()" the C++ way instead of "int()"?
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
