>   There's a reason for the new syntax. It has to do with abstract types
> (classes and template parameters). However, I don't think anyone is
> interested in another C++ lecture of mine... :P

On the contrary, I like reading them =)

Wouldn't the real C++ way be something like

reinterpret_cast<int>(some_double)

Or something like that? Not sure what type of cast it would be.

 - Slime
 [ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]

Post a reply to this message