gonzo wrote:
> Dan P <dan### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> 
>>Matt Burns wrote:
>>
<snip />
>>
>>I agree with this; I brought up Wings3D and found it impossible to do
>>what I could do in Hamapatch. But so many people love it, I just figured
>>I didn't spend enough time exploring the tool and/or did not understand
>>how to use it properly. This still may be true -- but from what I've
>>seen, my brain can get around HamaPatch a lot easier than Wings3D.
> 
> They are definitely two completely different approaches.
> 
> I have used Hamapatch for a couple of years and my initial experiments with
> Wings3d weren't too impressive. But I spent the whole last IRTC round
> making myself learn Wings, and now I can't give it up.
> 
> Somethings are still easier & faster in Hamapatch, but Wings does others the
> same way.  They compliment each other well.

Okay *gulp* but I'm not sure if my brain can handle Wings3D. It boggled 
my mind last time. I'll take the time, though; nobody has ever steered 
me wrong on these groups yet! :-)
-- 
Respectfully,
Dan P
http://<broken link>

Post a reply to this message