|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Christopher James Huff wrote:
> In article <408c3d0f$1@news.povray.org>, Darren New <dne### [at] san rr com>
> wrote:
>
>>Haven't you heard of launching lasers and light sails? :-) Anyway, you
>>*can* hold energy from absobed light indefinitely. That's what
>>photosynthesis does.
>
> But you can't continue to accumulate it indefinitely...for example, if
> the stored energy were never used, plants would eventually run out of
> CO2 and H20 to build the sugars which they store the energy in. You will
> eventually reach some equilibrium where total input == total output.
> However, if albedo includes radiation as well as reflection, then
> objects like suns and gas giants have albedos greater than 1.
Albedo does not include radiation by definiton. An object that emits
light radiation, like a sun, is the light source!
Also, if you count radiation outside of the visible spectrum, an albedo
will be a fraction of /all/ of that radiation, including the visible
stuff, which would /still/ be a value between zero and one.
> Also, albedo could be used to refer specifically to visible light...in
> which case it would actually be possible for the reflective albedo to be
> greater than 100%, due to fluorescent materials on the surface.
> Extremely unlikely on a dead rock, though a planet with a large amount
> of fluorescent plant life could do it naturally.
Such materials emit light and, therefore, cannot be a valid part of an
albedo value by definition. Albedos only concern /reflected/ light. If
an albedo value is above 1, it is an error -- it is not a /valid/ value;
it means that there is emissive material on the surface or a flaw in the
instrument that is reading the value.
--
Respectfully,
Dan P
http://<broken link>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |