|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Christoph Hormann wrote:
> Dan P wrote:
>
>> [...]
>>
>> Try substituting the word "brighter" with "more bright" and it may
>> sound more clear.
>
> Earth is neither 21% brighter nor 21% more bright than moon assuming the
> given albedo values. If you want to give percentual values you have to
> do it correctly, otherwise simply say the albedo of earth is 0.21 higher
> than that of earth (which of course isn't a very useful information).
The values are between 0 and 1. If they were between 0 and two, the
percentage would be half of what I said and so forth.
> The whole thing is probably a bit confusing because the unit of albedo
> is 1 (it is a ratio between two values of the same unit. If you have
> two people, one 1,60m tall and one 1,90m you also would not say one is
> 30% taller/more tall than the other...
True; but that is a different set that does not map to a range between
zero and one because it constantly changes. If you took a snapshot in
time, say the shortest person is A and the tallest person is B, then you
could normalize the number and, indeed, use percentages.
> Christoph
--
Respectfully,
Dan P
http://<broken link>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |