James Bulgin wrote:
> Thanks a lot for giving it a shot. It's doesn't really adress my origional
> problem (although that's probably because I wasn't specific enough), however
> it does seem to ruffle and break up more than my version. I'll have a little
> look at the source code now and see if there's anything I might glean from
> it. Thanks.

Anytime! I didn't think I got very close to what you needed, but I 
thought maybe the code might help in the ultimate solution somehow :-)

-- 
Respectfully,
Dan P
http://<broken link>

Post a reply to this message