St. wrote:

<snip />

>>AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1800+
>>1.54 GHz
>>512 MB RAM
>>Windows XP: 2002 SP 1
> 
> 
>   Thanks Dan. I thought it might have been a lot longer than that, but
> to say the least for a scene like that, that's fast.
> 
>   Was it the 1.54GHz or the 512Mb RAM that aided this, do you think?
> Or both? I feel your image would have taken considerably more time on
> my m/c. (I have 600MHz and 384Mb RAM, win98SE, Duron mb.).

Probably the memory :-) I have souped-up memory in this thing because it 
used to be a gaming box.

-- 
Respectfully,
Dan P
http://<broken link>

Post a reply to this message