Edward Coffey wrote:

> The trouble with rendering it as a solid object is that you have no more 
> information than the location of each point - other than simple 
> proximity there is no way of knowing whether two points should be 
> connected forming part of a surface, or whether there is a gap between 
> them that should not be filled. In the end you either just plot so many 
> points that it looks like a single surface, or use a guessing algorithm 
> designed to form a surface from a collection of points.

i don't think you need a guessing algorithm. maybe you could simply keep 
the last three points in memory and create a triangle for a mesh with 
it. then find the next point and create a triangle that uses two points 
from the last one and the new point. if i am wrong here, just tell me 
why, i don't know much about attractors...
bye,
	Marc

Post a reply to this message