"Dan P" <dan### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
news:4051061a@news.povray.org...
> "IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
> news:qki1501epqmvkeuedbec6odu4iivb0shcv@4ax.com...
> > On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 20:47:55 -0800, "Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >> That's like saying im lemon when it comes to tact, or fishburger, or
> > >> housetree or coupon when it comes to tact. Meaningless!
> > >
> > >Well, tact does require intelligence.
> >
> > No, just blind following of some social pattern. No intelligence
> > required in that.
>
> True. We all have to look at things objectively as well as subjectively
and
> seek to understand first before we judge. One of the things that really
> annoy me is when somebody proves some thing right and then extrapolates to
> say it proves everything else right. Just as an example (and for no other
> reasons but being an example), let's say that a particular event in the
book
> of Revelations in the bible happens. Some would then say, "See, see that
> proves the entire Bible is correct!" That is a falacious argument. It
would
> be like saying, "Because IMBJR has poor tact at this time in his life, his
> work isn't good either." That would be unfair and, as IMBJR said,
"stupid".
> Some of the greatest men in history would really piss us off if we met
them
> in person. :-)

Er, I'm saying that we should seperate our perception of his work from our
interpretation of his work here. I'm not making a judgement on the work
itself. :-)

-- 
- Respectfully,
Dan
http://<broken link>

Post a reply to this message