"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
news:ml9s40pbquu74smg1ka7d7klvqbqhqg1s0@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:36:27 -0800, "Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom>
> wrote:
>
> >"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
> >news:dmop40lc06i3hvs7jedlt2jj4p74e992st@4ax.com...
> >> >>     I appreciate the work that goes into them.
> >> >
> >> >heh, thank you for that considered and informative opinion. ;)
> >>
> >> I think he was referring to the work I put in them. Taking credit for
> >> my effort is yet another sign of the stupidity I see in this group.
> >
> >Okay: point 1 - don't call me stupid.
>
> Re-read. I refered to the group in general as stupid ("stupidity I see
> in this group"). If you take that as directed at you personally then
> you did so off your own bat.

<and so forth />

Wow, I'm catching up more on these threads and this is interesting.
Everybody is stupid in something, like Scott Adams said. For example, many
would have a case to say IMBJR that you're stupid when it comes to tact.
Thing is, does being stupid in that one thing make you stupid in general?

Post a reply to this message