Marc Jacquier wrote:

> 4021b3ed$1@news.povray.org...
> 
>>Not to be redundant, but I keep coming back to this picture and the more I
>>look at it, the more impressed I get. Check out that wrinkle in the paper
>>around that missing vacuum tube (if that's what that is -- I don't know
>>anything about the thing). I mean, you just don't see that level of
>>attention to detail and subtlety in anything but the greatest work around.
> 
> 
> Please don't credit me of things I didn't do :)
> What you call missing tube is a shielded tube and you can see the top of it
> through the top of the cylinder shield.
> The shield is cylindrical and the "wrinkle" is a radiosity artefact :-)
> 

istr recall that valve screening cans had a 'large at the top of the can 
diameter' spring that tapered down to about 0.5 the can diameter at the
top of the valve. that's what i thought it was.

> 
>>I, literally, right now, am printing off this picture to put it on my wall
>>for inspiration.
> 
> 
> You make me flush!
> 
>>Now, to be redundant, DAMN nice job!!!
> 
> 
> Thanks again
> 
> Marc
> 
>

Post a reply to this message